Sep 172011
 

This is an excerpt from an article by Lou Anders published in Batman Unauthorized. The complete title is TWO OF A KIND: Can the Team Behind Batman Begins Capture the Essence of the Joker? Bear in mind that this book came out a few months before the movie came out as rumors were leaked on the web of Heath Ledger having being selected to portray the crazy villain.

Note: This article does not reflect ideas, thoughts, or any way the point of view of the poster or this community. It is included here as a source of information

…so who is this Joker and where did he come from?

The Harlequin of Hate, as he sometimes called, was first introduced in Batman vs The Joker in Batman #1, spring 1940. In his first appearance, he was a deadly serious murderer, who announced his intended victim’s fates and dared the police to stop him. He was ghastly, ghostly, nothing to laugh about. In fact, he racked up quite a body count in his first twelve appearances, killing almost thirty people before sent to the electric chair. But the Joker developed a knack for cheating seeming-deaths, and this was far from the ond for the character, despite being originally conceived as a one-off. However, the editors of Batman began to fear that leaving a murderer on the loose undermined the Detective’s image, and so instituted a policy of only letting one-shot villains kill. For this and other reasons, the Joker was softened, dwindling into a clownish buffoon more interested in pranks than killing sprees. In fact he wasn’t even officially crazy. There was actually a comic in which the resolution involved Batman and Robin temporarily convincing the Joker he was going mad. “The Crazy Crime Clown” (Batman #74) saw the Joker placed in a padded cell, but ended with Bruce Wayne musing, “I see where the Joker’s recovered from the confusing night we gave him! They are transferring him to the state prison!” To which Dick Grayson replied, “Yes– he finally had to tell the authorities where Derek’s money was hidden in order to prove that he himself was sane!” To prove he was SANE? Are you sure?

The character then disappeared almost entirely for much of the 1960’s, and it wasn’t until the aforementioned Denny O’neil and Neal Adams run in a now famous story in 1973 entitled “The Joker’s Five Ways Revenge” (Batman #251), that he was returned to the level of a serious and murderous threat. It was in this issue that his lack of sanity was established. When he was incarcerated, we learn that it was not in Gotham Penitentiary as previous tales had it, but in a place called Arkham Asylum for the Criminally Insane (The name is a nod to the horror fiction of H.P. Lovecraft, Arkham being a fictional Massachusetts city that features heavily in his horror writings about the Cthulhu mythos).

The notion that the Ace of Knaves is “criminally insane” was given more depth in the Steve Englehart and Marshal Rogers run in a1978 story entitled “The Laughing Fish” (Detective Comics #475 and #476) which combined a deliberate reworking of the Joker’s original 1940’s appearance with a severely demented personality. To date, this issue remains one of the best portrayals of the character’s madness. Superman writer Kurt Busiek, in an article in Wizard Magazine, remembers, “Hands down, the best Joker bit ever, to my mind, is when he tries to copyright fish…It’s such a demented thing to do, but he persues it so intently, so matter-of-factly–pausing only to wonder if it might not work because people might stop eating fish, but reasoning that vegetarians would not go for it–that really makes him feel like a madman, rather than like a criminal with daffy overtones” (quoted in “Joker comics”)

From that point forward, the Joker was always depicted as being, if you will pardon the pun, batshit crazy. But it was Alan Moore’s landmark novel The Killing Joke that truly established the definite version of the character, retelling his origin story while allowing for differences in continuity. As the character said of his history, “Sometimes I remember it one way, sometimes another…if I’m going to have a past, I prefer it to be multiple choice!” Despite some confusion as to his former life, the idea that the Joker suffered a personal tragedy beyond just his physical scarring and equal to Bruce Wayne’s own loss was introduced as an explanation for the character’s madness. As recounted here, that tragedy was the death of his wife and unborn child. In this story, Joker shot Barbara Gordon in the stomach, paralyzing her for life, then kidnapped and brutalized her father Commissioner James Gordon, forcing him to look at photographs of his naked and traumatized daughter in an effort to drive him insane, an attempt to prove that anyone can have “one bad day” and become as the joker is now.

This unprecedented graphic violence escalated post-Killing Joke, with the Joker going on to murder Jason Todd, the second Robin, as well as Commissioner Gordon’s second wife, Sarah Essen. By 2007, the Joker was indisputably one of the most dangerous and insane villains in DC’s entire Universe. This is in evidence in the 1995 three issue Underworld Unleashed, in which Flash-nemesis, the Trickster said, “When supervillains want to scare each other, they tell Joker stories.”

So in the same way that we have crafted a definite Batman (In Batman Begins), we can come up with a set of guidelines for what a definite portrayal of the Ace of Knaves should look like?

To begin with the obvious: The Joker is dangerously insane. Far from being Cesar Romero in greasepaint and armed with a joy buzzer, this is Charles Manson meets Hannibal Lecter. A modern portrayal of the Joker needs to understand this and show us someone truly terrifying, worthy of the villain said to have killed more than 2,000 people, including, as recounted in a 1996 issue of Hitman, an entire kindergarten class. In short, he needs to be truly frightening.

Secondly, and this is minor but please indulge me, the Joker’s face is not fixed in a grin. True the character was modeled on Conrad Veidt from the 1928 film, The Man Who Laughs, based on the novel by Victor Hugo, about a boy whose face is mutilated into a permanent smile. Bob Kane and Bill Finger took inspiration for the Joker’s look from the character, but nowhere was it on record that his face was fixed. This misassumption found its way into the 1989 film in which the Joker’s face is frozen from a gunshot wound, but had stayed out of the comics until just this year, when Grant Morrison introduced the heresy in Batman 663, Nolan and Goyer will know better and won’t saddle Heath Ledger with any cumbersome and unnecessary prosthetics

But most important is that the Joker is the one person who truly understands the complex nature of the Batman’s code against killing. In fact, he is the single character in the Batman mythos who understands this as well as Batman himself, who grasps how tight a line it is that the hero walks and who knowingly pours as much pressure on his lline as he can in a calculated effort to force Batman to cross over.

In Frank Miller’s, “The Dark Knight Returns”, the Batman says, “I’ll count the dead, one by one. I’ll add them to the list Joker. The list of all the people I’ve murdered–by letting you live…” (117). For his part, while poisoning a troop of boys scouts, the Joker says, “They could put me in a helicopter and fly my up in the air and line the bodies head to toe on the ground in delightful geometric patterns like an endless June Taylor dancer’s routine–and it would not be enough. No, I don’t keep count. But you do. And I love you for it” (1 40). His “affection” for the Batman, whom he calls “darling” more than once, comes precisely from the knowing how much mayhem he causes wounds the other man. He knows exactly what he is doing, tormenting the Batman with his crimes, deliberately attempting to force the Batman to take a life preemptively. Finally in the end, when Batman broke his neck, but failed to do so with enough pressure to kill him, he chided, “I’m really…very disappointed with you my sweet…the moment was…perfect… and you…didn’t have the nerve…Paralysis…really…they’ll kill you for this… and they’ll never know…that you didn’t have the nerve…” (150-151). And the Batman lamented, “voices calling me a killer…I wish I were (150). The Joker finished himself off, and as the Batman hobbled away, the clown’s corpse seems to mock him for his lack of nerve.

But why this game? Why does Joker so desperately want to die at Batman’s hands? For that we have to turn to Alan Moore’s The Killing Joke. When explaining his rationale for brutalizing Barbara Gordon and then forcing her father to witness the footage, the Joker said, “You see, it doesn’t matter if you catch me and send me back to the asylum…Gordon’s been driven mad. I’ve proven my point. I’ve demonstrated there’s no difference between me and everyone else! All it takes is one bad day to reduce the sanest man alive to lunacy. That’s how far the world is from where I am. Just one bad day.”

Most of us don’t hinge our entire sense of sanity on one single facet of character. We don’t anchor our identity on a single razor’s edge. But the Batman does. Taking the methods of a criminal—breaking and entering, assault, vigilantism, etc—into his hands, the line he has drawn is his only self-justification, his only proof that the darkness has not completely swallowed him. But if the Joker can get the Batman to bend, just once, he can prove that anyone, even a person towering force of will, will snap if subjected to enough pressure—i.e., the Joker himself is blameless of his crimes, as he was just someone who snapped after a sufficient amount of tragedy. In The Further Adventures of the Joker, in a story by Mark L. Van Name and Jack McDevitt called “Happy Birthday,” Joker tried to demonstrated this once again. He calls in favors and threats all over town, pouring criminals onto the street, subjecting Gotham to a week of utter chaos. This takes predictable toll on the Caped Crusader. Then, at the culmination, he disguises himself as a cop and dresses a kidnapped cop as the Joker. Accompanying Batman on a raid, he asks the Dark Knight if he shouldn’t just do the the world a favor and pull the trigger, and for a moment, the Batman considers. Then Batman sees through the game. But at the story’s conclusion, the Joker remarks, “So I won that one. And sometimes at night, when the moon is high, and I know he’s out there, I feel a little better. The distance between us isn’t as great as it used to be.” (290)

This is spelled again in “The Clown at Midnight” (Batman #663): “You can’t kill me without becoming like me. I can’t kill you without losing the only human being who can keep up with me. Isn’t it ironic?!” Later in the issue, he mused, “I could never kill you. Where would the act be without my straight man?”

Grant Morrison’s Arkham Asylum is, even in Morrison’s admission, not a great portrayal of Batman, but it does get one thing right about the Joker. At the graphic novel’s resolution, the Batman agrees with the Joker and acknowledges the necessity of his own insanity. The result? The Joker is satisfied. Having finally gotten the admission he’s always wanted, she shuts everything down, surrenders, and walks Batman out of Arkham with an arm around his shoulder, promising him, “Enjoy yourself out there. In the Asylum. Just don’t forget—if it gets too tough…there’s always a place for you here.”

Just like Batman, the Joker has something to prove. Their motivations are locked like opposite poles of a magnet. That Batman draws back such a clear line in the sand is irresistible to a psyche desperate to see only shades of grey. He’s willing to murder the entire world if that is what it takes to make the Dark Knight relinquish his last, tenuous, and tiny finger-hold on dainty. His own salvation rests on proving his point. If Nolan, Nolan, and Goyer understand even half of this, we’ll be alright. Given their track record, I suspect we will be, and the most famous supervillain in the history of comics will finally be given his full cinematic due. After all, when you have this level of material to draw upon, anything else would be crazy.

 

Sep 152011
 

This is the section dedicated to the Joker from THE BATMAN VAULT: a museum in a book featuirng rare collectibles from the Batcave, edited by Robert Greenberger and Matthew K Manning. (2009).  I had posted it on my old blog and now revised and and present it here for your enjoyment.

THE JOKER

It could be just another one of his lies. He’s told his origin more times than most can remember, each version a bit more bizarre than the last. But there’s been one that’s stuck, a tale that rings a bit truer than the others.

He was a comedian wtih a pregnant wife, but he wasn’t very funny. With no money to support his growing family, he took a job with some men he shouldn’t have. He dressed up in a red helmet and a cape. Alongside the men who brought him into this new life of crime, he helped rob the Ace Chemical Processing Plant. When Batman showed up, the man in the red cape was startled by the giant bat creature and leapt into a vat of toxic chemicals. He emerged with bleached skin, green hair, and a smile on his face.

When he first appeared in Batman #1 in 1940, the Joker was merely a clown-faced murderer and not quite so complex a character as he would grow to be. Artists Bob Kane and Jerry Robinson and writer Bill Finger had been influenced by the 1928 film THE MAN WHO LAUGHS. A dark killer from the start, in his first appearance, the Joker announced his targets in advance, daring the police, and Batman, to stop him. And Batman did that very thing, but not until the Joker had actually gotten away with a few of his chilling crimes. At the issue’s end, the Clown Prince of Crime was intended to persish for his dastardly deeds, but was saved by the then editor Whitney Ellesworth, who found the character too intriguing to not bring him back to plague the Batman. Instead, Ellsworth had the story altered so that the Joker somehow managed to escape an otherwise fatal dagger to the chest.
Sep 122011
 

Browsing on the DC I found this new Brian Bolland book coming out this month. Though Mr. Bolland has done covers for a myriad of  DC series, his most famous work though is still THE KILLING JOKE which was recently reprinted in a special edition. He has done TONS of Joker art to enjoy, I am sure (maybe even a few less seen pieces). Here is the cover and info for the book and what a cover…:

17903_400x600_0

On Sale September 28, 2011
Written by BRIAN BOLLAND; Art and cover by BRIAN BOLLAND
Artist Brian Bolland, best known for his work as illustrator of the best-selling title BATMAN: THE KILLING JOKE, is the subject of this new hardcover collecting his covers for DC Comics. Featuring highly detailed and meticulous craftsmanship combined with dramatic takes on the world’s best-known Super Heroes, Bolland’s work has been featured on GREEN LANTERN, BATMAN, WONDER WOMAN, THE FLASH, ZATANNA and the Vertigo series THE INVISIBLES and ANIMAL MAN. This spectacular collection includes rarely seen and never-before-published art, along with commentary from Bolland.

DC Comics
208pg.
Color
Hardcover
$39.99 US

Source: DC COMICS HOME

Aug 042011
 

Hey Jokerholics,

Right from this month’s PREVIEWS CATALOG….our prayers have been answered. 

I don’t know who came with the idea, but I want to hug him/her/them and give them a big wet kiss.  It was about time in my opinion. I mean, if Batman, Wonder Woman, Green Lantern, and Superman can have their own mythology/story etc book, why not the most famous villain of all time?? This month’s PREVIEWS announced the publishing of a book dedicated only to…

 

THE JOKER: A VISUAL HISTORY OF THE CLOWN PRINCE OF CRIME HC and SC

scan_pic0001

  • On sale OCTOBER 11, 2011
  • Writer:  Daniel Wallace, Introduction by Mark Hamill
  • The book examines the evolutionof the most famous comic book villain in history, and is certain to appeal to fanboys and fangirls, collectors, and newcomers to the comic book genre alike.  From the Comic book origin in 1940s to the truly psychotic murderer and madman of today, THE JOKER is the first and only comprehensive look at the ultimate supervillain of DC Comics Universe’s comics, television shows and feature films
  • HARDCOVER  (9×12), 208 pages, PC  $50.00
  • SOFTCOVER (9×12), 208 pages, PC   $30.00

 

DON’T WAIT TO PUT YOUR ORDERS WITH TIME AT YOUR LOCAL COMIC BOOK SHOP or AMAZON.COM…..
 

 

Aug 042011
 

Here is the list of Joker related merchadise available to order from your Previews catalog

BATMAN ODESSEY vol 2 #1:  Though this story to me has not made much sense so far, I trust Mr Adams in his work.  He’s a great artist and knows his Batman…I hope!  Anyways,

  • On Sale OCTOBER 19, 2011
  • Written, Art and covers by Neal Adams (1:10 B&W variant cover by Neal Adams)
  • 1 of 7 issues, 32 pages, FC, $2.99, Rated T
  • Batman Odessy is Back in a new volume from legendary writer/artist Neal Adams!  It’s finally happeed:  Batman must kill or be killed.  The threat is real and can’t be stopped by man or hero. To combat it, Batman must bring time itself to a standstill so that he can embark on an odyssey of self discovery to a place unknown to mankind, whre he can find himself.  But is this place where only failure awaits?

DC COMICS PRESENTS:  CATWOMAN–GUARDIAN OF GOTHAM #1:  This is here because it has a small Joker cameo.

  • On Sale OCTOBER 26, 2011
  • Writer: Dough Moench  Art: Jim Balent and Kim DeMulder.  Cover: Jim Balent
  • Trade.  96 pages, FC, $7.99
  • In this tale, originally a 2-part miniseries, Catwoman is the protector of a darker than ever Gotham City–and she most protet the city’s criminals from the murderous vigilante called the Bat-Man!

DC COMICS PRESENTS:  BATMAN–THE DEMON LAUGHS #1

  • On sale OCTOBER 5, 2011
  • Writer: Chuck Dixon  Art: Jim Aparo and John Cebollero.  Cover: John Cebollero
  • Trade.  96 pages, FC, $$7.99
  • In this stories from BATMAN: LEGENDS OF THE DARK KNIGHT #142-145, Ra’s Al Ghul teams up with the Clown Prince of Crime for the first time.  Their mission:  Destroy the Dark Knight and take over the world!

JOKER: A VISUAL HISTORY OF THE CLOWN PRINCE OF CRIME

  • On sale OCTOBER 2o11 (by order in most comic book shops)
  • Book.  208 pages, PC  $30.00 (SC)  $50.00 (HC)
  • SEE POST BY ITSELF HERE!

RIDDLE ME THIS, BATMAN!:  ASSAYS ON THE UNIVERSE OF THE DARK KNIGHT.  This is here because in previous books about the Batman, there have been articles about Joker as well.  Read the those other articles at this link!

  • On Sale OCTOBER 2o11
  • Book.  SC 6×9 224pages B&W
  • Editors:  Kevin Durand and Mary Leigh
  • From the first comic-book appearance in 1939 though his many incarnations on the big screen, the archetypical superhero known as the Batman has never been far from the American conciousness.  Beyond the shaping the way we read comics and graphic novels, Batman has also captured the scholarly imagination, telling us much about our society and ourselves.  These essays examine Batman, through a wide range of disciplines–phylosophy, literature, psychology, pop culture and more

 

 

Jul 312011
 

(This interview is reprinted from the Forensic Files of the Batman (Simon and Shcuster iBooks, 2004) by Doug Moench. It is presented for your entertainment and not to profit in any way).

CASE FILE: #0023

DATE: Year one, Month four, Day Five

Annotated Transcript of Police Interrogation

More than ever, I am now convinced that the “behavioral science of psychological profiling” is vastly overrated and overvalued, as demonstrated by the following verbatim exchange between police profiler and true madman.

Developed by the FBI at Quantico, profiling has achieved a mythical status it does not deserve. While of limited use in some cases and under certain circumstances, the process is almost entirely speculative, little more than educated fortune-telling and similarly based on statistical smoke and mirrors. But the myth dies hard. Volumes are written about the “stunningly accurate” predictions about unknown serial killers, including their natures, habits, and even future actions, but such accurate profiles are actually quite rare. Far more common are all-wet predictions hung out to dry with little notice and no mention.

Moreover, even the most “successful” profile tends to be heavily weighted with vague and essentially useless probability (“likely a white male in his 20s or 30s” who “probably owns or has access to a vehicle” and who “feels comfortable operating in the area”), as well as a rife with the jaw-dropping obvious (“probably afflicted with antisocial tendencies” who “feels no remorse for his criminal acts” and who “will likely commit such acts again in the future”), while utterly lacking any meaningful specificity. The most thoroughly detailed profile typically narrows the list of possible suspects to mere millions. Such so-called analysis, in fact, tells us no more than is clearly seen on the face of it.

I am not alone in my skepticism. Aware that perpetrators are almost always caught by more conventional means, most street cops simply ignore profile bulletins. Some laugh at them. Pop-culture fiction and true-crime bestsellers aside, even other FBI agents view profiling as a “misuse of vital resources” better devoted to the hard forensic sciences. One described the celebrity status of fellow agents in the Behavioral Division as “a sick joke”.

When the “serial killer” in question is actually a multiple murderer like the Joker, with a mindset as unpredictably bizarre as his, any interrogation inevitably offers as much profile contrasting as comparing. The Joker might well be unique. And yet, as the very definition of “homicidal maniac,” he surely shares certain traits and modes of behavior with other deranged killers. While it is still early in the Batman’s career, I have yet to encounter a more dangerous individual and cannot imagine that I ever will. Understanding his mind and learning from his example is therefore crucial. And even a misguided interrogation contains valuable insights, if only the Joker’s responses to obtuse or irregular questions.

Hence the following transcript, with profiler’s name redacted and appropriate notes interpolated, although I do not myself pretend to have all the answers or fully understand the twisted evil of this nightmare clown.

 

Profiler: State your name for the record, please

Joker: I’d rather tattoo it on your forehead. Etched by hand with a blunt dirty needle dipped in dayglo acid [Laughter] Yowtch, that stings!

Profiler: Your name please. We can’t begin this talk without it.

Joker: Then shut up.

Profiler: Your name.

Joker: Call me Pagliacchi. [Giggling] But hold the drama and kill the tears.

Profiler: All right, we’ll let it go for now. You’ve waived your right to counsel and consented to this interview, is that correct? You have no objection talking?

Joker: I’d rather act than talk, but theses restraints… [Prolonged shrieking howling and violent thrashing]… well, they are rather restraining, aren’t they?

Profiler: Any further such outbursts, I must warn you, will not be tolerated.

Joker: And they’ll be stopped how? By restraining me? [Laughter]

Profiler: Can you tell me what happened to your face? Whit it’s so white?

Joker: I confess, I’m a night owl. The sunshine bores the daylights out of me.

Profiler: We’re discussing something more severe than the lack of tan. And it seems to affect all of your skin, not just your face.

Joker: Wanna verify, big boy? [Wild giggles]

Profiler: Just answer the question, if you will.

Joker: Chalk it up to a bleach job involving a tumble incident with a vat of chemical. Here’s me: Whoops, sploosh, yahhh! [Insane Laughter]

Profiler: And I suppose that’s also the explanation for your, uh, peculiar facial contortion?

Joker: What peculiar facial contortion would that be?

Profiler: The rictus…the exaggerated grin. It seems to be frozen in place.

It is, suggesting permanent nerve damage. It may be that his skin has been more than bleached. It might have been seared, and I wonder if the Joker exists in a state of chronic pain.

Joker: I’d like to think the chipper smile suits me. Happy is he whose work is his pleasure.

Profiler: Work?

Joker: You don’t think that slaughtering in mass quantities is easy, do you?

Profiler: So taking lives makes you happy? Makes you smile?

Joker: We’ve already established I need no catalyst for the built-in toothy mirth look. [Chuckles]

Profiler: Let’s talk about your mother…

Joker: So after I killed her, I left her for dead, so what? It’s not like I ate her, tempting sweetheart though she be. [Maniacal laughter]

This, like so many of his other responses, was a lie, or at least his idea of a joke. Apparently believed by the profiler, however, it led to some five minutes of dead-end questioning, here omitted along with a brief and meaningless discussion of the Joker’s father. Both subjects are potentially valuable avenues, but only if explored by a more skilled interrogator.

Profiler: How do you feel when you kill?

Joker: Amused and fulfilled, like shooting mimes on a moonlit beach. Long walks on moonlit beaches, by the way are some of my favorite things, along with puppies dogs with broken necks and hot fudge sundaes laced with strychnine. And before you ask, my favorite color is purple.

Profiler: So you’re amused by the act of murder?

Joker: Like shooting bluefish in a shallow barrel. Or loud mimes on an empty beach. [Laughter] And don’t forget fulfilled.

Profiler: Do you feel the need to kill? A compulsion?

Joker: Actually a passing whim’ll do.

Also apparently true, but in the Joker’s mind, there may be little or no difference between compulsion and whim. Just as he hides behind the “mask” of his leering white face, a façade of twisted humor may conceal much deeper and darker urges. Like a jack-in-the-box, his violence springs forth in the guise of a garish clown. And because the dark box containing his violence is a psyche impossible to recognize or understand, its explosion is always unexpected. But unlike a jack-in-the-box—which first shocks and then draws laughter as relief—the Joker craves laughter first, then kills it with shocks of horror.

Profiler: You’ve been charged with murdering nine people…

Joker: Is that all?

Profiler: …and wounded seven more.

Joker: Gotta get out on that shooting range, sharpen the old aim. [Laughter] Pretty bad when they’re still squirming after the fifth shot, but pass the ammo anyway.

Profiler: The people you killed or injured shared little in common. Different physical types, different ages, weights, races, both gender and all were strangers. How did you select your victims?

Joker: Other than having transparent windows, that’s the standing issue, isn’t it?

Profiler: Standing?

Joker: If they can stand, they can fall. I ask nothing more of future meat. [Insane cackling] With freshness thus assured, what hunter could resist?

Profiler: Then you’re a hunter? You think of yourself as a predator?

Here the questioner again falls into the rhetorical trap, as he does repeatedly, demonstrating his ability to see only what he’s looking for. He may well be the Joker’s straight man. Time and again, instead of objectively assessing his subject, he tries to fit the Joker into the familiar pattern of previous profiles, as if seeking some master key to unlock the pathology of every killer. But despite any and all similarities, every killer is unique. And in the case of the Joker, that truism is taken to an almost surreal extreme.

Joker: I think of myself as the clown prince of merry mayhem and murderous mirth, the scary trickster who makes you shriek. So what’s your excuse?

Profiler: Your complete lack of remorse and empathy is noted. In fact, it’s a given. Do you think you feel superior to other people?

Joker: Feeling is thinking, a waste of time, and killing time is always more productive.

Profiler: But is that why you’re able to kill people? Because they seem inferior to you, not really people at all, but more like animals, like prey?

Joker: I ain’t about to get religion at this point, bub, so just pray yourself.

Profiler: If you could drop the act for a minute, just between you and me, I want to ask you a serious question.

The modern jester persona may well be a pose, but the Joker’s dementia is not an act. He is fully and genuinely insane.

Joker: I don’t do serious.

Profiler: Would you describe yourself as a narcissistic personality?

Joker: I get the best cell in Arkham, don’t I?

Profiler: To which you will soon return. So how do you feel about that?

Joker: I could use a break. [Soft laughter] At least for a while, and then comes the other kind of break.

Profiler: How did you feel about been apprehended for the second time?

Joker: He cheated! [Shrieking] I don’t know how, but he always cheats.

Here the Joker becomes enraged, his previous tone of lunatic clowning instantly gone.

Profiler: You’re talking about Detective Bullock?

Joker: You know damn well who I’m talking about! Gordon’s secret weapon—and they call ME batty!

Profiler: If you’re referring to this so called “Bat-man”, you’re the third one to do so in the last month. And it’s no joke, in my opinion. In fact, I sense a fascinating sociological phenomenon here, one with real momentum. Do you think the entire underworld could be in the grip of some strange mass hysteria?

Joker: You got that right, but nobody’s laughing. I can’t even get the boyos to crack a smile these days. They’re all too afraid of their own shadows. I’ll probably have to cut out his heart and serve it up on a platter before good times roll again.

Profiler: You’re NOT joking. You actually believe in this Bat-man, don’t you? Even you.

Joker: A swift kick on the head works wonders in the convert department

Profiler: But “a gargoyle coming to life” – a giant bat swooping down the night sky? Surely that’s just a myth, a figment of criminal imagination

Joker: Looked upward lately?

Profiler: You’re right, that Bat image beamed into the clouds probably started the whole thing. But that’s just some advertising gimmick. Or maybe the newspapers are behind it, looking to build circulation by concocting better stories.

Joker: And maybe the coppers are behind it. [Sly disgust] Maybe Gordon.

Profiler: If so, wouldn’t it make more sense to see the light—maybe I shouldn’t say this—as just a ploy on the part of the police department, some form of psychological warfare?

Joker: More like his logo, an upside-down spotlight cueing the main attraction, big Bat’s act.

Profiler: And yet the record here is clear. You were arrested by Homicide Detective Harvey Bullock.

Joker: That clumsy oaf couldn’t arrest his own fetid breath! Bats GAVE me to the Bull! He turned me over to the cops, but he cheated!

Profiler: All right how did he cheat!

Joker: You tell me and we’ll both know. There’s no way he should have found me so soon! [Snarling] You said it yourself! I only bagged nine, a lousy single night’s work! I was barely setting up for Shooting Gallery Two, letting the next night fall and watching the light come on in all the faraway windows, showing my longshot targets all around, and then he crashes down through the roof like hell busting loose before I can even score my first shot. So you tell me how his boots found the right roof because I don’t know. It’s like he’s in league with the darkness!

Or in this case with light and more specifically the finely focused beam of a laser used to determine bullet trajectory.

The entire murder spree had taken less than three hours, from half-past nine to shortly after midnight, with all the victims shot by high-powered rifle through their closed windows. Since the recovered rounds were all the same make and caliber, they were almost certainly fired through the same weapon, making ballistics comparison a formality that could wait. Finding and stopping the shooter was more pressing.

The victims were scattered, their punctured windows ranged near and far, and located on upper floors as well as lower. The bullet holes held the answer, and much can be gauged by the naked eye alone, including the shot’s approximate angle, after closely examining the characteristics of a single hole through a single window. The beam from a portable laser projected from within the room, outward through the hole and along that angle, then traces the bullet’s probable trajectory with a fair degree of accuracy. Such a laser beam, if not stopped by a building or some other obstacle, can reach all the way across the city. The beam, in fact, becomes an illuminated ghost of the bullet’s passage, with the shooter’s position located at some point along the beam, most likely at the end.

Furthermore, a beam aligned through the window hole from a second fixed reference point— the bullet’s terminus deeper in the room—traces the trajectory with perfect precision. Final impact with a victim, however, will yield only an approximation of the bullet’s terminus, the victim having fallen or slumped.

These sniper shootings, fortunately, were committed from a considerable distance, with one or more misses preceding the fatal or wounding shot at a number of the scenes. This meant that each missed shot left a second fixed reference point, a final impact in wall, ceiling, floor, or furniture. A laser beam projected from the bullet’s final impact through its window of entry hole would thus point straight to the shooter’s position.

After selecting and visiting two scenes with missed shots and multiple holes in glass, wood and plaster, I needed no further confirmation. Every beam projected from the first two sites lined up perfectly, converging on the same location from multiple angles and two different directions. And with every beam stopped by the same structure, they revealed the sniper’s firing position with pinpoint precision and the position revealed the sniper’s identity. The killing spree bullets had been fired from the storage attic of the funhouse in Gotham’s abandoned amusement park, where the Joker had indulged his latest idea of fun.

Profiler: Listen to yourself. “In league with darknesss.” You’re describing the bogeyman.

Joker: I told you, I’m describing someone a lot more batty than me. Who else could have stopped me? Why am I shackled in here instead of out plugging more windows?

Profiler: Good police work. Detective Bullock’s report mentions a portable laser used to—

Joker: Don’t make me laugh. [Venomously]

Profiler: All right, however it went down, you were arrested and here we are. Trying to get to the bottom of what happened before you were arrested. Can you just give me a sense of why you did it?

Joker: Surely you jest.

Profiler: But how did you come up with the idea? Was it something you planned for a long time or did it come on suddenly? Was it spontaneous? And what was the point of it? Were you trying to terrorize the city? Was it a political in some way? Ideological? Or would you say you’re simply consumed with unreasoning hatred for just anyone and everyone, driven by urges having no other outlet?

Joker: All of the above, except most of it.

Profiler: Would you say your urges have certain triggers?

Joker: No, but my guns certainly do.

Profiler: And why do you use guns? Because they fill you with a sense of power?

Joker: Because they fill meat with holes [Insane laughter]

Profiler: That’s the best you can come up with? The best explanation for your appalling actions? A sick joke?

Joker: If you’re so smart, trump me, baby!

The only predictable aspect of the Joker’s criminally insane psyche is its inherent unpredictability. Given the chance, he will kill and kill again, but how, why, when and whom he will kill cannot be anticipated. His reasons and methods are not random but are so quixotic and impulsive they might as well be. The overriding insight provided by this profiling attempt, therefore, is that the Joker cannot be profiled.

Profiler: I’m just trying to understand you. What you’ve done is wrong and this is the second time you’ve done it. Abhorrent multiple murder. Think about that, about all the truly despicable things you’ve done, all the heartache you’ve caused. And believe me when I say I want to help you stop, but you have to make SOME sense, okay? You have to toss me a bone here and there and we’re running out of time. Now, before you’re remanded back to Arkham as an incurable sociopath, isn’t there anything important you’d like to say?

Joker: Nice tie, great shade of cop blue. Want me to tighten it until your face matches? Maybe pull your tongue out and staple it to—

Profiler: All right, the interview’s over. I give up.

And I never will. Case closed—but only for now. Note to self: Explore improvements to Arkham security.

Apr 022010
 

I bought a copy of Alex Ross’ new book ROUGH JUSTICE which is a wonderful collection of rough sketches from this comic book master’s career.  I am including some Joker scans that I found on the book, and will include the quotes that go with it in the book

First is the sketched wraparound cover for Ross’ book.  A common (extreme closeup) image of  Batman  giving Joker a dose of whoop-ass:

 

These are the Joker turarounds for Justice Action Figures wave 3:
 

An idea sparked from proposal for  a prestige format titled BATBOY that was to be 2 or 3 issues long.  Basically it was a collection of “imaginary stories about the supersons of Batman and Superman.  The series wanted to explore the next generation of stablished heroes and villains like this picture here of the Joker and his daughter. Unfortunately this idea never saw the light.

At the time Ross worked in the Batman RIP covers, he had many initial concepts including the Joker cover below, but  since he “had missed out on storylines that linked the Joker and Ra’s al Ghul, so the sketches [I] included them in could not be used”  A pitty really because it was a very good idea I think, but then I might be biased since I like Alex Ross’ work and I love Joker.  The two together are just divine.

Well, that’s it hope you folks enjoyed the scans.